Cohabitation agreements are literally agreements made between parties who are
living together and who are not married, nor do they intend to marry. If people who intend to marry wish to enter into an agreement in relation to
the relationship, then such an agreement would be called a pre-nuptial
agreement. Refer to our Pre-nuptial Agreements Kit. Cohabitation agreements are much the same as a "defacto" agreement.
A defacto agreement would normally refer to people of different sexes living in
a defacto relationship. While there are different legal definitions of a defacto
relationship, for these purposes we essentially describe it as people of
opposite sex living together as husband and wife. Such agreements can also be
referred to as cohabitation agreements. When people of the same sex reside
together in a relationship, then the agreement made between them would usually
be called a cohabitation agreement. Unless the agreement specifies otherwise, the effect of the cohabitation
agreement may continue even though the parties subsequently decide to marry. It
would then operate as a pre-nuptial agreement. Property disputes between people of the same sex or opposite sex who live
together outside of marriage do not fall within the provisions of the Family Law
Act. Disputes arising from their relationship are normally determined by the law
relevant to the State in which they reside. There are a number of States and
Territories in Australia who have specific defacto legislation. These are New
South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Northern Territory and the Australian
Capital Territory. The other States and Territories do not have specific legislation that refers
to people in a relationship outside marriage. In those circumstances the common
law applies. The common law is the law that has evolved over time and is not the
result of legislation (law passed by Parliament). The common law largely makes
no distinction about whether the parties were in a relationship or were
strangers. The same law applies to both. In those States where there is no legislation, any dispute arising out of a
breakdown in the relationship would be determined in the Supreme Court of the
State. This can be an expensive process. Even in the States and Territories
where defacto legislation exists, any dispute arising out a failed relationship
can be costly and time consuming. For that and other reasons, parties often
decide to enter cohabitation agreements so that it can be clearly set out what
assets were brought by each of them into the relationship, how the continued
ownership of those assets are to be dealt with and the use of those assets,
together with what should happen in the event that the relationship breaks down. In the States where the common law applies, then: it would be unlikely that a court would set aside the terms of the agreement
subsequently. However, in States and Territories where there is legislation, other factors
need to be taken into account. It may be that if agreements meet the criteria
set out above then again they may be followed by the court in the event of a
later dispute. Find-a-Lawyer experienced in Family Law. Read about Co-Habitation Agreement Kits. DISCLAIMER This Information Outline is available courtesy of AussieLegal’s
online legal information and law firm referral service. The information is provided by participating law firms. Accordingly, neither
AussieLegal Pty Limited nor eBroadcast accepts any responsibility for loss,
damage, cost or expense arising from using the information provided. As the information provided by participating law firms is of a general
nature, the law firms accept no liability for any loss, damage, cost or expense
that arises from relying on the information provided by them. The information is
provided solely on the basis that readers will be responsible for making their
own assessment of it. This recognises that despite the participating law firm’s
best endeavours to provide up to date accurate legal information and documents,
you may misunderstand or misinterpret instructions or advice.