<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
 <channel>
  <title>News - Australian Politics</title>
  <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/</link>
  <generator>http://www.eblah.com</generator>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
   <title>Abortion laws</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1286879944/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1286879944/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[What do you guys think?<br /><br /><img class="imgcode" src="https://www.getup.org.au/files/campaigns/choicehero.jpeg" alt="" /><br /><br /><blockquote>
 <div class="win3 quoteby"><strong>Quoted Text</strong></div>
 <div class="win quotebody">It's hard to believe this is happening in Australia. As you read this email a young couple from Cairns are on criminal trial for attempting to have an abortion.<br /><br />Tegan was just 19 years old when she was charged under archaic 111 year old laws that classify abortion as a criminal 'offence against morality'. If found guilty, she faces up to 7 years imprisonment.<br /><br />How can this happen in Australia? Because in Queensland, and in other states, abortion is still illegal in the criminal code. And despite the fact that 90% of Australians believe early-term abortions should be legal, an extreme minority has our politicians scared into inaction.<br /><br />An anti-choice organisation has organised a petition in defence of these archaic laws, with over 6,000 signatures. The opposing petition, calling for the laws to be scrapped, has less then 3,000. Let's fix that right now, so that no politician has an excuse for inaction. Please add your name and forward this to friends before the petition is printed in huge newspaper ads later this week:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/my_choice_is_no_crime">http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/my_choice_is_no_crime</a><br /><br />As a result of this case, public hospitals in Queensland have started refusing abortions - even to women whose pregnancy is due to sexual assault.<br /><br />Doctors fear criminal prosecution and up to 14 years imprisonment for providing advice and treatment, leaving young couples in impossible situations.<br /><br />How on earth could this happen in Australia? The Queensland Parliament has failed to act, because MPs have been flooded with phone calls and emails in support of these archaic laws.<br /><br />Some extreme anti-choice activists have even thrown flaming molotov cocktails at Tegan's house. We can't stand for this in Australia.<br /><br />Please add your name to the national petition for choice today, and forward it to friends and family:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/my_choice_is_no_crime">http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/my_choice_is_no_crime</a><br /><br />Queensland Premier, Anna Bligh, said she would support a bill to repeal the laws - but won't introduce one herself. She says there isn't enough support - and her colleagues in Parliament have been silent so far.</div>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:39:04</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Dara</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Election 2010</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1279331855/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1279331855/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[<span style="font-style: italic;">So, it's August 21st.&nbsp;&nbsp;Until 3 months ago I was a swinging voter.&nbsp;&nbsp;Now I am not.&nbsp;&nbsp;Why? Because of the comments of certain&nbsp;&nbsp;forum members (not necessarily here).&nbsp;&nbsp;As a former fee paying member of the Liberal Party of Australia, I now understand why I am no longer one.</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="/blahdocs/Smilies/huh.gif" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="" /><br /><br /><strong>Game on for winter election</strong><br /><br />Prime Minister Julia Gillard has confirmed Australians will go to the polls on August 21.<br /><br />In her first press conference of the campaign, Ms Gillard repeated the message she has been pushing since she became Prime Minister – that she wants to take Australia forward.<br /><br />Ms Gillard has been in the top job for less than a month after the overthrow of Kevin Rudd, who won the 2007 election for Labor.<br /><br />Her opponent, Tony Abbott, is also a relatively new leader having ousted Malcolm Turnbull as Coalition leader late last year. Both are seeking the support of the Australian people for the first time.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/?WT.svl=mainNav#justin=sa">http://www.abc.net.au/news/?WT.svl=mainNav#justin=sa</a>]]></description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:57:35</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>2010-your vote for in the next Fed Election?</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1277619715/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1277619715/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[I can honestly say I don't know yet <img src="/blahdocs/Smilies/undecided.gif" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="" /> <img src="/blahdocs/Smilies/huh.gif" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="" /> <img src="/blahdocs/Smilies/roll.gif" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="" /> <img src="/blahdocs/Smilies/cry.gif" style="vertical-align: middle" alt="" />]]></description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:21:55</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>SuziH</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>The New Prime Minister of Australia</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1277342231/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1277342231/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[Julia Gillard is the new PM of Australia.<br /><strong>Labor figures plot to dump Kevin Rudd - report<br />From: news.com.au June 23, 2010 7:32pm</strong><br /><br />ALP figures are reportedly secretly canvassing numbers for a move to dump Kevin Rudd and replace him with Julia Gillard.<br /><br />Powerful party figures have been involved in talks with a view to ousting the Prime Minister, the ABC reports.<br /><br />But the Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard had so far rebuffed the advances.<br /><br />The reports come during Parliament's final sitting week before the winter break.<br /><br />Sky News reported the move was coming from the party's Victorian right faction.<br /><br />The Australian Workers' Union is now backing Ms Gillard to take over the Labor Party's leadership.<br /><br />A senior source said that the AWU had switched their support from Mr Rudd to Ms Gillard.<br /><br />However, Ms Gillard's office said her position had not changed.<br /><br />Ms Gillard has repeatedly denied she wants to wrest party leadership from her boss.<br /><br />Last month, she said there was &quot;more chance of me becoming the full forward for the Dogs (AFL team the Western Bulldogs) than there is of any change in the Labor Party.&quot;<br /><br />However, Ms Gillard's office has confirmed she was meeting with the Prime Minister in his office this evening. <br /><br />Nine News reported that NSW senator Mark Arbib, Victorian senator David Feeney and parliamentary secretary Bill Shorten told Ms Gillard earlier today that they had lost confidence in Mr Rudd and wanted her to run.<br /><br />She gave no answer.<br /><br />The news of a potential leadership spill comes after Tony Abbott today declared Kevin Rudd &quot;unfit&quot; to be prime minister.<br /><br />The Opposition Leader ran through a litany of &quot;failures&quot;, including the pink batts program, the shelved emissions trading scheme and the biggest &quot;crime&quot; of all, the resource super profits tax.<br /><br />&quot;A prime minister who has so misjudged a decision of this magnitude ... is a prime minister he is no longer fit to govern this country,&quot; Mr Abbott said.<br /><br />Mr Rudd's leadership has been questioned over his handling of the proposed mining super profits tax.<br /><br />Earlier today Mr Rudd would not confirm reports his government was planning to reshape the 40 per cent tax in a bid to end a damaging row with the mining industry.<br /><br />&quot;A lot of the negotiations have been very, very good,&quot; Mr Rudd told reporters in Canberra.<br /><br />Mr Rudd is due to fly out to Toronto on Friday for a meeting of G20 leaders.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/features/federal-election/labor-figures-plot-to-dump-kevin-rudd/story-e6frfllr-1225883383543">http://www.news.com.au/feature.....frfllr-1225883383543</a><br /><br /><strong>Why Julia Gillard decided it was time to dump Kevin Rudd<br />By Simon Benson From: The Daily Telegraph June 24, 2010 8:26am</strong><br /><br />THE final straw for Julia Gillard came early yesterday.<br /><br />Angered by a morning newspaper report leaked from the Prime Minister's office, questioning her loyalty, she called senior powerbroker and fellow Victorian MP Bill Shorten. She wanted to know what to do.<br /><br />&quot;It p***ed everyone in the caucus off,&quot; said a NSW senior factional leader.<br /><br />&quot;And it p***ed her off, too. She has been nothing but loyal. And to have that happen was not only stupid but unwarranted.&quot;<br /><br />Just before Question Time at 2.30pm, the Deputy Prime Minister sounded out a select group of Cabinet colleagues. What should she do?<br /><br />They had been giving her that answer for weeks.<br /><br />Challenge him.<br /><br />By late afternoon, Shorten, fellow Victorian Senator David Feeney, NSW MP Tony Burke and South Australian right wing factional leader Don Farrell went to see Ms Gillard in her office.<br /><br />They had been conspiring for the past week and they wanted her to challenge.<br /><br />&quot;I'll consider it,&quot; she said.<br /><br />The dice was rolled.<br /><br />Shortly after 7pm, Ms Gillard's office called the Prime Minister's Office and told them that Ms Gillard wanted to see the PM.<br /><br />The pair had been due to have dinner later in the evening at the Lodge. Mr Rudd was called back from a function to celebrate the 20th anniversary of parliamentary service for Senator Nick Sherry, around the corner from his office in the Ministerial wing of Parliament House.<br /><br />With Ms Gillard was Defence Minister and fellow left-wing factional heavyweight John Faulkner, a NSW senator.<br /><br />She informed the PM that she intended to challenge him for the leadership. She wanted a ballot. The pair remained behind closed doors for almost two hours.<br /><br />As the two were locked in an intense negotiation, interrupted twice by Rudd loyalists Anthony Albanese and Lindsay Tanner, the factional leader from NSW Mark Arbib hit the phones.<br /><br />Shorten, dining in the Canberra suburb of Kingston with colleagues including Sports Minister Kate Ellis, was also glued to the phone.<br /><br />They still had no idea what Ms Gillard had decided.<br /><br />But by 9pm, they were confident they had the numbers to swing behind her should she decide to do it.<br /><br />The answer was revealed at 10.20pm when the PM called a press conference and revealed he had been visited by Ms Gillard, and confirmed that the challenge was on.<br /><br />This morning, at 9am, she goes into a special caucus meeting with the bulk of the members of the NSW Labor Right, the Victorian Right, the South Australian Right and the Victorian Left behind her.<br /><br />Queensland right-wing powerbroker, Senator Joe Ludwig, was also on board. The deal was that Treasurer Wayne Swan - the man who voted against Rudd in the spill against Kim Beazley - would be Ms Gillard's deputy.<br /><br />The Victorian Right had been courting Gillard for the past two weeks, urging her to challenge. &quot;We can't win with this bloke,&quot; they told her.<br /><br />Arbib, the NSW numbers man who put Rudd into the leadership in 2006, had been sounding out support among select MPs for a change.<br /><br />The internal polling provided by the party's national secretary Karl Bitar was worse than the public polling, which had already put the Government in a losing position. But Gillard's loyalty prevented her from doing the unthinkable.<br /><br />She was refusing to act.<br /><br />And they were unwilling to tap the Prime Minister on the shoulder themselves.<br /><br />Factional leaders said the nail in the coffin for Rudd was a dinner on Tuesday night in Parliament House for the country's business leaders.<br /><br />&quot;His speech was pure anger and venom,&quot; said a minister who witnessed the event.<br /><br />&quot;It was bizarre. The cream of the country's business community were there. And they were stunned. So were we.&quot;<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/features/federal-election/why-julia-gillard-decided-it-was-time-to-dump-kevin-rudd/story-e6frfllr-1225883474357">http://www.news.com.au/feature.....frfllr-1225883474357</a><br /><br /><strong>Labor's Julia Gillard is Australia's first female Prime Minister<br />From: news.com.au June 24, 2010 11:12am</strong><br /><br />JULIA Gillard says she is &quot;honoured&quot; to become Australia's first female Prime Minister after she won a stunning leadership contest against Kevin Rudd this morning.<br /><br />&quot;I feel very honoured and I'll be making a statement shortly,&quot; she said.<br /><br />Ms Gillard is expected to make a full statement at 11am (AEST).<br /><br />In a historic decision, Labor MPs decided to oust Mr Rudd who will go down in history as the first Prime Minister ever to be turfed out by his party within his first term of winning power.<br /><br />The leadership handover occurred without a ballot after Mr Rudd decided not to force his supporters into declaring their support.<br /><br />Ms Gillard's victory was assured last night after most of the Rudd government ministers, including Treasurer Wayne Swan, decided to end his run as the Labor leader.<br /><br />A confident Ms Gillard, flanked by the Treasurer who will become her deputy, walked into the Caucus meeting, certain they had the numbers to defeat Mr Rudd.<br /><br />At 9.36am (AEST), Caucus spokesman and New South Wales Senator Michael Forshaw emerged to declare Ms Gillard would become Australia's next Prime Minister.<br /><br />&quot;The new leader elected unopposed is Julia Gillard, the new deputy leader is Wayne Swan,&quot; Senator Forshaw said, outside the Caucus room.<br /><br />Ms Gillard, and the man she ousted as national leader, addressed a dazed Labor partyroom.<br /><br />Mr Rudd - who won power in 2007 with a popular Kevin 07 campaign - bowed to pressure from his colleagues and withdrew from the contest, assuring Ms Gillard's ascension to the leadership.<br /><br />Mr Rudd's decision to stand aside came as he lost the backing of key factional brokers and powerful unions including the Australian Workers Union after ALP powerbrokers formed the view that the Government was heading for defeat unless it changed leaders.<br /><br />A suite of Ministers, including Sports Minister Kate Ellis and Climate Change Minister Penny Wong, decided to back Ms Gillard.<br /><br />Heading into the Caucus meeting, senior factional leaders claimed Ms Gillard had at least 70 votes from a Caucus of 112.<br /><br />Mr Rudd's defeat represents the most stunning political turnaround imaginable, for a leader who just a few months ago was rivalling Bob Hawke in the popularity stakes.<br /><br />But a series of political mistakes including ditching the emissions trading scheme and rolling out a new 40 per cent &quot;super&quot; profits take on the mining sector, saw a collapse in Mr Rudd's and Labor's vote.<br /><br />The historic vote of confidence for Ms Gillard will see her installed as Australia's 27th Prime Minister.<br /><br />Mr Forshaw said it had been a difficult time for both Mr Rudd and the Labor Party.<br /><br />&quot;He led us to victory in 2007, a victory that was achieved when many people thought that we would still be spending more years in Opposition.<br /><br />&quot;That is a great achievement, he did that with Julia Gillard as the Deputy Leader.&quot;<br /><br />Mr Forshaw said he is now looking &quot;confidently forward to the next election&quot;, led by the new team.<br /><br />Mr Rudd ignored questions from reporters as he left the Caucus room.<br /><br />He was accompanied by senior ministers John Faulkner and Kim Carr and Queensland backbencher Jon Sullivan.<br /><br />Labor's new leaders have left the Caucus room without speaking to reporters.<br /><br />Frontbencher Craig Emerson said Mr Rudd was &quot;not as happy as gay&quot; as he left the meeting.<br /><br />&quot;Julia Gillard is Prime Minister and we will all completely and fully support her,&quot; he said.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/features/federal-election/julia-gillard-is-australias-first-female-prime-minister/story-e6frfllr-1225883620482">http://www.news.com.au/feature.....frfllr-1225883620482</a><br /><br />]]></description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:17:11</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>SuziH</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>State and Fed. Govt.'s raise the cost of living.</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1275098940/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1275098940/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[<strong>States fight law on power bills<br />By Natasha Bita and Rosanne Barrett From: The Australian May 29, 2010 4:45am</strong><br /><br />THE states are baulking at a national consumer law that would let electricity companies disconnect customers too poor to pay their bills.<br /><br />The Queensland Government yesterday approved a 13 per cent rise in electricity prices from July 1, boosting the average bill to $396 a quarter - a 40 per cent increase over four years.<br /><br />But NSW and Victoria declared they would refuse to sign &quot;watered-down&quot; consumer protection laws to be considered by the Ministerial Council on Energy in Melbourne on June 11.<br /><br />Victorian Energy Minister Peter Batchelor insisted his state's standards were better for consumers. &quot;We aren't prepared to lower our standards to the suggested national framework,&quot; he said.<br /><br />&quot;We want to ensure the wrongful disconnection payment scheme and financial hardship policies continue to deliver real protection against disconnection for customers who find themselves at risk.&quot;<br /><br />NSW Energy Minister Paul Lynch said the national legislation must mirror NSW's safeguards for householders in financial strife.<br /><br />&quot;If the current protections are not maintained, we will not be part of the national framework,&quot; Mr Lynch said.<br /><br />West Australian Energy Minister Peter Collier said his state was not obliged to commit to the new energy consumer law. &quot;Any future discussion to adopt it will include careful consideration of the benefits to the state.&quot;<br /><br />And Queensland Energy Minister Stephen Robertson said there were strict legislative requirements that retailers must meet before disconnecting power.<br /><br />&quot;I will be ensuring any national reforms do not compromise these protections for consumers in Queensland,&quot; he said.<br /><br />NSW Energy and Water Ombudsman Clare Petre revealed a 47 per cent rise in the number of complaints about high electricity bills last financial year, including 597 households disconnected for non-payment, and another 877 threatened with having the power cut off.<br /><br />Ms Petre said she was concerned the proposed new legislation would remove consumer protection for small businesses such as takeaway food shops.<br /><br />&quot;They might be small and unsophisticated but happen to use a lot of power,&quot; she said.<br /><br />&quot;They'll be classified in the same way as a mine or a big business, and that's our concern.&quot;<br /><br />She said the new law would make it easier for companies to rapidly disconnect customers with a record of non-payment, many of whom were in hardship.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/national/states-fight-law-on-power-bills/story-e6frfkvr-1225872789161">http://www.news.com.au/national/states-fight-law-on-power-bills/story-e6frfkvr-1225872789161</a><br /><br />]]></description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 12:09:00</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>SuziH</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>The Greens</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1273477411/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1273477411/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[<strong>Border protection protocols failing: Greens</strong><br /><br />The Greens say there needs to be a public inquiry into how the Federal Government responds to asylum seeker boats.<br /><br />Five asylum seekers are presumed to have drowned in waters north-west of Australia after the boat they were in ran out of supplies and they decided to swim for help.<br /><br />The remaining Sri Lankans have been rescued and taken to Cocos Islands.<br /><br />The Federal Government says it was aware of the boat at least a week and a half ago.<br /><br />Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young says there needs to be an investigation.<br /><br />&quot;Obviously something is not working right when we know a boat was there and two weeks later five people are dead,&quot; she said.<br /><br />&quot;We need to take some responsibility for looking at our own protocols - what we do when we find a boat, what we do in terms of the interception - and those protocols must be made public.<br /><br />&quot;It seems fairly clear that if we knew that this boat was in the waters, coming towards Australia with vulnerable people - asylum seekers on board - that we should have been monitoring it better.<br /><br />&quot;How has it come about that five of these people are now presumed dead?&quot;<br /><br />Refugee Action Coalition spokesman Ian Rintoul says the response by authorities appears inadequate.<br /><br />&quot;It does seem that there has been a real lack of responsibility by the authorities not to have sent a boat out immediately,&quot; he said.<br /><br />&quot;They knew it was in trouble, they knew it was without food, they knew it was without fuel. To have left people on the sea in those conditions is inexcusable.&quot;<br /><br />Customs officials say they were advised the boat carrying 64 asylum seekers had run out of fuel, food and water while heading to Cocos Island on April 30.<br /><br />They say a passing merchant ship provided assistance and reported they were in good health and their vessel was seaworthy.<br /><br />Customs spokesman Phil Mayne says the boat was expected to arrive at Cocos Island last Wednesday, but a search was launched when it failed to turn up.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Controversial ad</strong><br /><br />Meanwhile the Greens are appealing to the Opposition to withdraw a television advertisement which refers to asylum seekers as &quot;illegals&quot;.<br /><br />The ad was launched over the weekend and includes Opposition Leader Tony Abbott saying the Coalition would take real action to stop illegal immigration.<br /><br />Senator Hanson-Young says the ad is appalling and relies on fear mongering.<br /><br />&quot;I'm quite concerned about the impact that these ads will have and I appeal to the Opposition to pull them immediately,&quot; she said.<br /><br />&quot;I also think that it's time that the Advertising Standards Board consider the ads as well as ACMA [the Australian Communications and Media Authority].&quot;<br /><br /><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/10/2894944.htm">http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/10/2894944.htm</a><br /><br />]]></description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:43:31</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Poor little TV stations need more cash</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1266111098/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1266111098/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
 <div class="win3 quoteby"><strong>Quoted Text</strong></div>
 <div class="win quotebody"><strong>Minister in 'secret' snow meeting with mogul</strong><br /><br />The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy. Source: The Australian <br /><br /><ul><li>Minister meets billionaire Kerry Stokes in the USA <br /></li><li>Stokes owns Channel 7 <br /></li><li>Later announced huge benefits for networks <br /></li></ul><br /><br />COMMUNICATIONS Minister Stephen Conroy held a secret meeting and went snow-skiing with Seven's billionaire owner Kerry Stokes at a ritzy American resort only weeks before handing over a $250 million gift to Australia's free-to-air TV networks. <br /><br />The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal that Senator Conroy - a skiing and snowboarding fanatic - met Mr Stokes in Vail, Colorado, in January, while the Government was considering pleas from the free-to-air industry to cut their licence fees.<br /><br />Mr Stokes has purchased several properties in Vail's Beaver Creek, including a luxury $15.5 million penthouse.<br /><br />The meeting came a month before the Victorian-based Senator Conroy cut licence fees paid by Seven, Ten and Nine for the next two years, depriving the Government of about $250 million in revenue.<br /><br />The decision was controversial because Senator Conroy said it was to protect Australian content - but it included no binding requirement for the networks to spend the money on Australian content.<br /><br />Both Mr Stokes and Senator Conroy refused to say what was discussed.<br /><br />Mr Stokes, through a spokesman, said he had &quot;thoroughly enjoyed&quot; skiing with Senator Conroy.<br /><br />Senator Conroy confirmed the secret meeting when questioned by the Sunday Herald Sun and said his conduct was &quot;entirely appropriate.&quot; He did not mention the pair had gone skiing.<br /><br />&quot;Last month I visited Colorado on a personal holiday, which was fully paid for by me, including all airfares from Australia to Colorado,&quot; Senator Conroy said.<br /><br />&quot;On one day during this trip I visited Mr Stokes and returned to my accommodation that evening.&quot;<br /><br />Senator Conroy said he regularly met with senior communications stakeholders to discuss matters relevant to his role as Minister for Broadband Communications and the Digital Economy.<br /><br />&quot;These include Mr Stokes and senior representatives of his companies, John Hartigan (News Ltd chairman and CEO), Kim Williams (Foxtel CEO), John Porter (Austar CEO) and David Gyngell (Nine CEO).<br /><br />&quot;All of my conduct with Mr Stokes and his associates, and all other stakeholders in my portfolio, has been entirely appropriate,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Senator Conroy said he also attended the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas and the West Coast Australian American Leadership Dialogue while he was in the US.<br /><br />&quot;I did not meet any representatives of Mr Stokes at either forum,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Seven spokesman Simon Francis said: &quot;Mr Stokes is enjoying his annual holiday at Beaver Creek in the United States, as he does every northern winter. It his own personal time and given that, we don't canvass how he enjoys his holidays.<br /><br />&quot;But, Mr Stokes says he thoroughly enjoyed his couple of ski runs with Senator Conroy.&quot;<br /><br />Beaver Creek is an exclusive resort in the Colorado Rockies that has some of the finest skiing in America.<br /><br />Mr Stokes, who owned a property there, made headlines in 2002 when he bought a sumptuous six-bedroom, six-bathroom penthouse for $15.5 million, smashing the previous property price records.<br /><br />Senator Conroy would not answer questions on whether he'd accepted any hospitality from Mr Stokes.<br /><br />&quot;Any items that require disclosure will be disclosed under the rules of Parliament,&quot; he said.<br /><br />On February 3, Senator Conroy updated his list of declarable interests, covering the month of January. It makes no mention of any matters involving Mr Stokes.<br /><br />Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is a previous recipient of Mr Stokes's hospitality, staying in Mr Stokes's mansion in Broome, WA, last year.<br /><br />Senator Conroy announced on February 7 that free-to-air providers would pay $250 million less in licence fees over the next two years in order to protect Australian content.<br /><br />But his decision contained no clause making it compulsory for the networks to spend the money producing Australian content, meaning the money will instead go directly to their bottom lines.<br /><br />Pay-TV operators, including the biggest broadcaster, Foxtel (which is part-owned by News Ltd, publisher of the Sunday Herald Sun), were unhappy, accusing the Government of giving preferential treatment to the free-to-air operators.<br /><br />Senator Conroy is already under pressure after recommending his mate, former Queensland Labor MP Mike Kaiser, should get a $450,000-a-year job with NBN Co, the government agency responsible for rolling out the Government's $43 billion national broadband network.<br /><br />The Government is also under fire over revelations Environment Minister Peter Garrett had been warned 13 times about dangers in the Government's funding of housing insulation.<br /><br />The flood of money spawned a rise in untrained operators, leading to a spate of house fires.</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/national/minister-in-secret-snow-dinner-with-mogul/story-e6frfkw9-1225830083475">http://www.news.com.au/nationa.....frfkw9-1225830083475</a><br /><br /><br />Let's face it the great experiment to see how badly Labor can screw the country needs to end. Time to hand things back to people who understand how to run things not idiot trade unionist who only know how to grab money out of a barrel. I wonder if I'd have read this story if my internet connection had been &quot;conroyed&quot;?]]></description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:31:38</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>aquamonkey</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Rise of Nationalism?</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1265191244/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1265191244/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[Noticed the hysteria surrounding Australia Day, the number of Southern Cross tattoos, and the patriotic fervour with the Union Jack Australian Flag?<br />Is there something behind this or is there simply a healthy groundswell of patriotism and nationalism amongst the people on the street?<br />Not sure that I am entirely comfortable walking past bare chested youths with flags draped over their tattooed backs drinking VB.<br />Am I alone?]]></description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:00:44</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>bwendo</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>South Australian Censorship!</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1265109327/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1265109327/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/censoring-free-speech-in-the-secret-state/story-e6freabl-1225825715408">http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/censoring-free-speech-in-the-secret-state/story-e6freabl-1225825715408</a><br />Censoring free speech in the secret state <br /><br />MANY regimes around the world have attempted to do the unthinkable - censor free speech. The South Australian Government appears to be one body which is going to successfully apply such suppression.<br /><br />Such a draconian move should come as no surprise. In many ways, it is entirely predictable.<br /><br />The State Government has long made obvious its distaste for those who disagree with its policies in any form and to any degree whatsoever.<br /><br />It is indeed difficult to recall a government of any persuasion being quite so sensitive.<br /><br />Amendments to the Electoral Act, which came into force on January 6 and which require all bloggers and contributors to political debate to list their real name and postcode during an election campaign, appears to be an attempt to silence public dissent and opposition to government policy.<br /><br />The changes to the law were overseen by Attorney-General Michael Atkinson and passed through Parliament with a pace akin to the night when MPs rapidly voted themselves the right to have cars paid for by South Australian taxpayers.<br /><br />Although they are aimed at the internet, specifically AdelaideNow (The Advertiser's website), the legislation could in some instances just as easily apply to radio shows which involve talkback.<br /><br />Of note, the new law would also appear to cover Twitter, the social network the Premier uses to spread his political message.<br /><br />It is equally troubling that Isobel Redmond and the Liberal Party supported the law change.<br /><br />They, too, obviously feel the need to avoid public scrutiny and questioning.<br /><br />The big question here is, can legislation be used in this state to restrict free speech and combat the rise of technology?<br /><br />Technology moves much quicker than any government. There is a multitude of different forms and platforms for political ideas.<br /><br />AdelaideNow may provide the most prominent platform for someone to comment on the March election, but it is far from the only one.<br /><br />Every major media outlet in Australia carries some form of political blog.<br /><br />Then there are the growing number of opinions to be found in places such as Facebook and MySpace.<br /><br />It's hard to imagine South Australia's Electoral Commissioner will prowl the internet day after day during the election campaign policing such a ridiculous law.<br /><br />Realistically and logically, there is no need. All blogs and comments published on AdelaideNow are moderated. Broadcasters monitor and moderate what is broadcast.<br /><br />All also abide by extensive laws that prevent the publication or broadcast of defamatory and other illegal material.<br /><br />The legislation also further enforces South Australia's reputation as a place where secrecy flourishes. It is instructive that similar laws were also enacted in China last year, a country which has yet to embrace free speech.<br /><br />It is also instructive that the Federal Government examined the same issue after the 2007 election and decided to exclude blogs and online comment from any requirement to provide names and addresses.<br /><br />South Australia is a state that grants more suppression orders than any other, it is a state where it is acceptable to leave hundreds, if not thousands, of parliamentary questions unanswered for years at a time, where pursuing Freedom of Information requests is nothing short of a battle.<br /><br />The people of South Australia who elected these MPs of both persuasions are having their rights eroded in the most undemocratic fashion.]]></description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:15:27</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Dara</dc:creator>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Australian National Anthem</title>
   <link>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1264469998/</link>
   <comments>http://www.ebroadcast.com.au/eblah/m-1264469998/#num1</comments>
   <description><![CDATA[I found this article and wondered what others think...<br /><br /><strong>Australians all, let us not lie</strong><br /><br />Bob Ellis<br /><br /><strong>We choose as our friends those we feel we don't have to lie to, those who share with us a common set of assumptions on music, morals, reading, sport and entertainment options</strong>. <br /><br />We choose as our philosophy or our religion or our creed a set of rules that makes us comfortable, that doesn't when it's articulated make us cringe. <br /><br />And it's for similar reasons we all hate, I think, we all inwardly hate the Australian National Anthem. We give way to untruth every time we stand for it. We give way to untruth every time we sing it. We are not stirred when we hear it at the Olympic Games. We feel vaguely shamed by it, as the Canadians, French and Finnish are not by theirs. <br /><br />Their songs enlarge them. Ours makes us feel, however slightly, like dickheads. Though 'I Am, You Are, We Are Australians' brings us to tears of pride, especially when sung by children, 'Advance Australia Fair' makes us cringe. And when we stand up for it, we are usually, inwardly, lying.<br /><br />Every one of the first six lines rings false. We are not young. We are not free. Our soil is not golden. Wealth does not come from toil here, but from birth or short-selling or real estate. And though we are 'girt by sea' so are all islands, and we are an island, and this is scarcely worth noting. And our land does not 'abound with precious gifts', it is two-thirds desert. Unless you count uranium I suppose, and the immensity of coal that is currently choking the planet, it does not abound, it is a desert waste. <br /><br />The very first line, 'Australians all, let us rejoice', rings as false as 'I did but see her passing by' or 'tough but humane'. In real life you rejoice or you do not, you cannot be asked to rejoice. You can be asked to give thanks, for that is a form of words. You can be asked to bow your head in prayer. You cannot be asked to rejoice, for that is a spontaneous emotion, and you have it or not. <br /><br />When Mrs Thatcher said 'I say unto you: rejoice' at the end of the needless Falklands War, she was as falsely tuned as we are when we are called upon to fill with joy at the thought of the oldest and driest land with one of the cruellest colonial histories, of poisoned flour and stolen children, and not one Indigenous person or immigrant Vietnamese, or Sudanese, or Palestinian in our Senate or House of Representatives, and give vent to our pleasured excitement. This is a problem to work on, not a victory to rejoice in. <br /><br />The second verse 'For those who come across the seas/We've boundless wealth to share' is an especially big lie. Our wealth is not boundless, and BHP Billiton does not like to share it. And boat people coming here across the sea if detected are towed back to Indonesia, or, until quite recently, imprisoned in Woomera, Baxter, Port Hedland, Villawood or Nauru. <br /><br />The image of easy prosperity, true for some who buy their way in for a million dollars, is not, however, true for those Kosovans who fled here from ethnic cleansing and were soon sent back to the neighbourhoods their families were killed in. <br /><br />Nor those Hazaras fleeing the Taliban who were accused of being Taliban themselves, and charged a million dollars for their incarceration. <br /><br />A national anthem should above all not lie to us; not lie to us clumsily, or even smoothly. It can avoid certain historical subjects, for we all have ugly national secrets, but it should not say things that are not true. <br /><br />'Young and free' was not true of Aborigines for our first 189 years and it is not widely true of them now. Outback squalor, infantile deafness, poor education, child-betrothals, incest, wife-beating, frequent gaolings and Third World levels of health outcomes, do not add up to freedom. <br /><br />Nor can the world's oldest continuing cultural traditions, 40,000 or 50,000 years of them, be called young. This country is only young if we ethnically cleanse from our national memory our original people, and the half million we murdered or brought through trauma and grief to death by kidnapping, alcohol, unjust imprisonment and centuries of mockery. <br /><br />Canada has a history as abominable as ours but has a good national anthem that does not slither into lying. <br /><br />O Canada (it says)<br />Our home and native land!<br />True patriot love in all thy sons command.<br />With glowing hearts we see thee rise,<br />The True North strong and free!<br />From far and wide, O Canada,<br />We stand on guard for thee.<br /><br />And so, in a more rousing way, does (amazingly) New Zealand. <br /><br />God of nations! at Thy feet <br />In the bonds of love we meet, <br />Hear our voices, we entreat, <br />God defend our Free Land. <br />Guard Pacific's triple star, <br />From the shafts of strife and war, <br />Make her praises heard afar, <br />God defend New Zealand<br /><br />Men of every creed and race <br />Gather here before Thy face, <br />Asking Thee to bless this place, <br />God defend our Free Land. <br />From dissension, envy, hate, <br />And corruption guard our State, <br />Make our country good and great, <br />God defend New Zealand.<br /><br />Ours, alas, is very different and, on most grand occasions, dismaying. What should we do about this bear-trap of denial, untruth, bad poetry and poor music? <br /><br />Well, Gough Whitlam had a National Anthem Competition in 1973 (and I, not that it matters, was one of the six finalists), which was abandoned after the Musicians' Union demanded payment every time the new song was broadcast, but it wasn't, inherently, a bad idea, and we could do the same thing now, and get Bill Shorten to negotiate with the relevant union thugs. <br /><br />New words to our best tune 'Song of Australia' wouldn't hurt. Or 'I Still Call Australia Home'. Or 'Waltzing Matilda' ('Sing for Australia, work for Australia, pray for Australia at sunset and dawn', and so on). Or we could ask Bruce Woodley, as he did for the Marysville fires, to rewrite or condense the words of 'I Am, You Are, We Are Australian'. <br /><br />Or simply sing it as it is, a celebration of our multiculturalism, our convict past, our Aboriginal heritage. There is no law that says a national anthem can't be three minutes long. An orchestral truncation of it would suffice at the Olympic Games when we win gold medals. But at football games, and cricket Tests, and State funerals, and parliament openings, it could be sung in full, with the crowd joining in at the chorus, and stir us, as an anthem should, to love of country, pride in ourselves, community forgiveness, an extended hand across differences. <br /><br />I came from the dream-time, from the dusty red soil plains<br />I am the ancient heart, the keeper of the flame.<br />I stood upon the rocky shore, I watched the tall ships come.<br />For forty thousand years I've been the first Australian.<br />We are one, but we are many<br />And from all the lands on earth we come<br />We share a dream and sing with one voice:<br />I am, you are, we are Australian<br />I came upon the prison ship, bowed down by iron chains.<br />I cleared the land, endured the lash and waited for the rains.<br />I'm a settler, I'm a farmer's wife on a dry and barren run<br />A convict then a free man, I became Australian...<br /><br />And so on. I can't see any argument against this; can you?<br /><br />Or perhaps you'd prefer to stand up for the rest of your life singing 'girt by sea'.<br /><br />It's not healthy, I think, to give roaring voice at public events to a pack of lies. <br /><br />Or perhaps you disagree.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2800878.htm">http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2800878.htm</a>]]></description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:39:58</pubDate>
   <dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
