Hello eBroadcast Administrators,

I have some experience in writing in articles for websites, including my own, and have some good experience in TV news. I was wondering if I could apply for a position as a reporter in eNews.

Thanks

EDIT: I would be also be able to do a Technology News section.

I have a question!. . . *I know I will regret this. . I am not blonde either*. . there are guest users on line. . and sometimes members too, who are viewing news. . . where is that news?. . . I can't find it.

Dear all,

I apologise if this is post in the wrong forum.

Recently, I noticed a number of eNews articles written by “eNews staff and agencies” tend to be in favour of Channel Ten, this has been highlighted by recent Big Brother related events.

I am aware a number of Channel Ten and Big Brother supporters in this forum, some of those are moderators. However, a number of articles tend to help or in favour of of Channel Ten.

Is this eBroadcast owned or sponsored by Channel Ten? If not, why do we have articles attacking rival networks (Channel Seven in particular) but not even an article condemning Channel Ten's turkey slapping scandal?

I've noticed a little anti-nine bias occasionally but nothing really against seven.

Nothing's against 7. It's their site and if they want to post articles on 10 then let them it's not up to you. Also I bet you are just saying that as judging by your signature you hate channel 10 and love today tonight which has done nasty stuff to 10.

The moderators can't post there, although I would like to post some articles there sometime.

Quoted from dara

Nothing's against 7. It's their site and if they want to post articles on 10 then let them it's not up to you. Also I bet you are just saying that as judging by your signature you hate channel 10 and love today tonight which has done nasty stuff to 10.

Judging by your signature, you hate Channel Seven. Yes, it's their site. As an eNews reader, I believe everybody has the right to show his/her concern about eNews articles.

Today Tonight did nothing wrong, they merely revealed some dirty scandals Channel Ten and Big Brother wanted to hide from public.

Since both Channel Ten and Big Brother chose not to elaborate the scandal that caused removal of two house mates, and treated them as they've never existed. Rival channels provided the wanted news for us all. It is clear eNews articles targeted rival networks' coverage but not on Channel Ten's "lack" of explanation.

Just read the story on enews about TT and can see your point.

The bias against seven is obvious.

I remember reading a story awhile back about nine still being 'the one' but the entire article was clearly biased against nine.

But if ten runs enews what can you expect? Objectivity?

Quoted from antony

Today Tonight did nothing wrong, they merely revealed some dirty scandals Channel Ten and Big Brother wanted to hide from public.

Today tonight did do something wrong. They said behindbb was the official site. LIE! They made fake users and created fake posts on behindbb- LIE! they manipulated stories and told several lies and used copyright material from behindbb.

There is a bit of a bias against Seven. Just look at the TT story from today.

The articles aren't exactly in favour of Nine, but they are definitely pro-10.

Good thing.
7 was in the wrong on the TT story...

Quoted from antony

Dear all,

I apologise if this is post in the wrong forum.

Recently, I noticed a number of eNews articles written by “eNews staff and agencies” tend to be in favour of Channel Ten, this has been highlighted by recent Big Brother related events.

I am aware a number of Channel Ten and Big Brother supporters in this forum, some of those are moderators. However, a number of articles tend to help or in favour of of Channel Ten.

Is this eBroadcast owned or sponsored by Channel Ten? If not, why do we have articles attacking rival networks (Channel Seven in particular) but not even an article condemning Channel Ten's turkey slapping scandal?

Who employs you?

Excactly! Also the owners didn't want to discuss turkey slap at 1st because of legal issues, and I don't think 7 and 9 should have been allowed to show the scene.

Who cares, it's one article... get over it.

Quoted from dara

Today tonight did do something wrong. They said behindbb was the official site. LIE! They made fake users and created fake posts on behindbb- LIE! they manipulated stories and told several lies and used copyright material from behindbb.

Today Tonight did not state directly that behindbigbrother.com was the official site. They did give people wrong impression. That was their "mistake", not a "lie" as you put it.
Today Tonight did say the official website/forum owned by Channel Ten and BigBrother removing forum posts... which was true.

There's no rule excludes Today Tonight from registering an account. They did not "make fake users" as you mentioned.

One statement from this eNews article which overly quotes behindbigbrother.com, "Today Tonight used images and content from behindbigbrother.com without permission"

Today Tonight did not use behindbigbrother.com's images as their images. They are allowed to show screen captures (or commonly known as screenshots). Further, Today Tonight did not use behindbigbrother.com's content directly nor claim it was theirs, there's no copyright infringements.

Quoted Text

Also the owners didn't want to discuss turkey slap at 1st because of legal issues, and I don't think 7 and 9 should have been allowed to show the scene.

Legal issues? It seems to me, it was Channel Ten/Big Brother's excuse. Channel Ten/Big Brother were simply too embarrassed to report those. It is obvious the court did not stop other media reporting/investigating "turkey slapping scandal."
In contrary, Seven News even reported their own presenters were sued by the Government before they were cleared over a boy wanted to divorce his parents story.

disclaimer: I don't work for and I am not affiliated with Seven Network.