Make eBroadcast my Homepage | Contact Us   Return To The Main eBroadcast Homepage
Australia
eBlah! The Aussie Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
Forum Login
Login Name: Create a new account
Password:     Forgot password

eBlah!    Technology    Technology - PC Talk  ›  PC Talk
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

PC Talk  This thread currently has 5212 views. Print
2 Pages 1 2 » All Recommend Thread
Aussies-Online
October 8, 2005, 11:28am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Check my new website still under construction

For everything about PC Hardware

http://computer.aussies-online.com/
Logged
Aussies_Online
August 11, 2006, 1:08am Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted Text
Don't buy that new PC just yet

IF YOU'RE in the market for a new desktop PC, we suggest that you keep your wallet in your pocket for just a few weeks more. The reason? Intel has just released a new breed of superchip, christened Core 2 Duo, which leaves even the mightiest Pentium processors eating its digital dust.

And despite taking a razor to the wholesale price of the former king of the CPU jungle, the new Core 2 Duo line remains relatively closely priced to the Pentium series while blazing past it in every stopwatch test. So if you've got your eye on a new PC, cool your heels and keep saving.

By the middle of next month you'll be able to buy a Core 2 Duo machine for not much more than today's Pentium-based desktops. If money is really tight, you can shop around for a Pentium system for much less than today's asking price.

Expert websites and respected technical magazines are reporting real-world gains of 30 per cent for recording and ripping video and 40 per cent for running Photoshop. The US online hub AnandTech.com found that even the cheapest Core 2 Duo chip outgunned Intel's Pentium Extreme Edition hot rod.

At the same time, the Core 2 Duo series are said to draw about 30 per cent less power than their predecessors, making them equal parts Schwarzenegger and Scrooge. It's the IT equivalent of enjoying howling V8 performance with the fuel economy of a four-cylinder sedan.

The reason is the chip's design. The Core 2 Duo is the first in what Intel expects to be a long line of processors built to a new specification called the Core micro-architecture.

"The Core micro-architecture is a complete departure from what the Pentium was based on. It's a complete redesign from the ground up," says Kate Burleigh, Intel's marketing manager.

This clean-sheet approach allowed Intel's engineers to use concepts and technologies unavailable in the late 1990s, when the last-generation Pentium 4 processor was on the drawing board. It unshackled the chip's designers from that era's obsession with raw speed and shifted the focus to processors that worked smarter instead of harder.

"The first time I saw the benchmark figures for the Core 2 Duo I just didn't believe it - I thought our engineers were kidding around with us!" Ms Burleigh recalls.

"What's really great is that the improvements are so readily apparent. It's very easy for consumers to see the benefits right away."

Those benefits aren't limited to doing everything faster, even if the Core 2 Duo is the most powerful desktop chip in Intel's 38-year history.

Because the new chip requires substantially less power and thus generates less heat, it reduces the need for noisy fans to reduce the PC's temperature. This should lead to smaller, quieter media-centre systems better suited to the living room.

When the notebook version of the Core 2 Duo arrives in the coming months, this trait will allow manufacturers to craft even sleeker and lighter laptops with improved battery life.

But for now, all eyes are on the desktop space as manufacturers roll out the first Core 2 Duo systems.

Typically quick off the mark is Dell, which will add the Core 2 Duo and the supercharged Core 2 Duo Extreme as optional powerplants in its forthcoming Dimension 9200 and XPS 700 machines.

"The Dimension 9200 desktop is designed for the multimedia needs of consumers and small businesses and will be followed by the XPS 700 gaming desktop, as well as Core 2-based notebooks and mobile workstations," says Jeff Morris, senior product manager with Dell Computer, who claims that in some cases the desktop chips deliver performance improvements "of up to 60 per cent compared to previous generation technology".

Hewlett Packard will introduce the Core 2 Duo into its media centre line, with the current Core Duo systems moving down to the middle rungs on the ladder.

"You'll get a much quieter PC because you don't need to have the fans running at full speed to keep the CPU cool," says HP Australia's Manpal Jagpal.

"On top of that, it's got the processing muscle you need in a media centre. If you're recording TV, for instance, the system is writing to the hard drive and compressing the video, and that needs a lot of processing power."

The Core 2 Duo signals the end of the line for the Pentium, which debuted in 1993. Over time it will also replace the Core Duo chips. Before the Pentium brand is put out to pasture, Intel expects it to make a final run in the low-cost desktop paddock.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/08/08/1154802893859.html

Logged
Reply: 1 - 18
normangerman
August 11, 2006, 1:15am Report to Moderator
Guest User
I will always be an AMD man.
Logged
Reply: 2 - 18
MeanDean
August 11, 2006, 1:43am Report to Moderator
Guest User
The processor wars are going strong though and good for it because it keeps them affordable.
I'm going to wait quite a while I think.  

I find that the wikipedia is really good for these sort of things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_2
My motherboard has the right socket but I don't know about the BIOS upgrade being there or not.  Anyway, it's supposed to be beating the crap out of things running at a higher frequency while still handling an insane overclock... then again maybe that part was written by someone who only uses it for web browsing.
It's really amazing that just when things are supposed to reach a physical limit they're expanded in other ways.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Intel_CPUs

It looks like someone's deleted the AMD comparison article but there's lots of links in See Also here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD#See_also
Logged
Reply: 3 - 18
ALLEYCAT
August 11, 2006, 10:05pm Report to Moderator

Gold Class eBlaher
Posts: 912
Posts Per Day: 0.42
Time Online: 10 days 11 hours 8 minutes
Location: Queensland
Im happy with my  Gigabyte G1975X  i'll stick with it for another year then look at rebuilding


Logged Offline
Windows Live Messenger Reply: 4 - 18
antony
August 15, 2006, 12:32pm Report to Moderator
Gold Class eBlaher
Posts: 962
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Time Online: 4 hours 51 minutes
Location: Sydney
PC World has compiled a list of the 25 greatest computers...
The IBM PC is 25. And here are the top PCs ever, from machines you owned and loved to systems you've never heard of.

The winners are...

1. Apple II (1977)
2. Compaq Deskpro 386 (1986)
3. Xerox 8010 Information System (1981)
4. Apple Macintosh Plus (1986)
5. IBM ThinkPad 700C (1992)
6. IBM Personal Computer, Model 5150 (1981)
7. Commodore Amiga 1000 (1985)
8. Tandy TRS-80 Model 100 (1983)
9. Columbia Data Products MPC 1600-1 (1982)
10. Apple PowerBook 100 (1991)
11. Sony VAIO 505GX (1998)
12. MITS Altair 8800 (1975)
13. IBM Personal Computer/AT Model 5170 (1984)
14. Atari 800 (1979)
15. Shuttle SV24 Barebone System (2001)
16. Tandy TRS-80 Model I (1977)
17. Toshiba T1000 (1987)
18. Hewlett-Packard OmniBook 300 (1993)
19. Apple iMac, Second Generation (2002) (commonly known as iMac G4)
20. Gateway 2000 Destination (1996)
21. Alienware Area-51 (1998)
22. Hewlett-Packard 100LX (1993)
23. Apple eMate 300 (1997)
24. Toshiba Qosmio G35-AV650 (2006)
25. Non-Linear Systems Kaypro II (1982)

Sadly, some brands are off the market.
Toshiba had 2 in the list,
Hewlett-Parkard had 3 (including one from Compaq)
IBM made 3 into the list,
and the biggest winner is ...
Apple with the number 1 Greatest PC and a total of 5 products in top 25 Greatest PCs of all time.

Congratulations.


Logged
Site Reply: 5 - 18
normangerman
August 15, 2006, 5:01pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Good to see at least ten Windows-running computers there
Logged
Reply: 6 - 18
GlenTheAdmin
August 15, 2006, 5:22pm Report to Moderator
Administrator Group
Posts: 409
Posts Per Day: 0.17
Time Online: 62 days 41 minutes
whoohoooo! Go the Commodore Amiga!


Logged Offline
Reply: 7 - 18
ALLEYCAT
August 15, 2006, 6:48pm Report to Moderator

Gold Class eBlaher
Posts: 912
Posts Per Day: 0.42
Time Online: 10 days 11 hours 8 minutes
Location: Queensland
Quoted from admin
whoohoooo! Go the Commodore Amiga!


I still believe it was the best comp ( of its generation) if you converted it to todays standards youd have the same as IBMs Big Blue!

But howeversaying all that think you should let go of the "dummy" admin and update  


Logged Offline
Windows Live Messenger Reply: 8 - 18
antony
August 17, 2006, 12:44am Report to Moderator
Gold Class eBlaher
Posts: 962
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Time Online: 4 hours 51 minutes
Location: Sydney
Quoted from normangerman
Good to see at least ten Windows-running computers there
Are you so sure?

My counting is only 4.


Logged
Site Reply: 9 - 18
Aussies_Online
August 24, 2006, 12:52am Report to Moderator
Guest User
I currently have two computers. A P2 and a P4.

The P2 has served me well for 6 years and is still a great computer.

My problem is that I have a scanner using a SCSI card into an ISA slot.

The P4 does not have an ISA slot.

I do like my scanner and do not wish to buy a new one (which of course would be the easy way out).

So the first question is:

1) Would it be possible to find a SCSI card fitting in a PCI slot?
The card I have is AVA-1502AP
The scanner is Canon CanoScan 300
I have it running on Windows XP with the Canon updated drivers.

Second question

2) Do any of you knows what hardware I would need to run 2 computers on the one monitor?
Someone was telling me that it is possible.

Third question

3) I am also considering installing a network between the two PCs.
But as I have never used network before, I am not really sure of its capabilities. I always thought about network as being used to retrieve data from another PC.
Can you actually  run the applications on the other PC via networking?
The real question is:
Could I run my scanner on the P2 from the command on the P4?

Logged
Reply: 10 - 18
antony
August 24, 2006, 12:25pm Report to Moderator
Gold Class eBlaher
Posts: 962
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Time Online: 4 hours 51 minutes
Location: Sydney
Quoted from Aussies_Online
1) Would it be possible to find a SCSI card fitting in a PCI slot?
Yes, but probably not that easy or cheap to find one, as SCSI is now considered a great technology but being phased out.

Quoted from Aussies_Online
2) Do any of you knows what hardware I would need to run 2 computers on the one monitor?
It's called KVM Switch (or Video Switch or Monitor Switch).
KVM stands for keyboard, video monitor and mouse. you can use one set of keyboard, monitor and mouse to switch between multiple computers.

Quoted from Aussies_Online
3) I am also considering installing a network between the two PCs.
But as I have never used network before, I am not really sure of its capabilities. I always thought about network as being used to retrieve data from another PC.
Can you actually  run the applications on the other PC via networking?
It's an yes and no answer. It depends on the application. In Mac, you can run some applications via networking I am not certain if you can do so with Windows or not. Perhaps, you can use Remote Desktop Connection if you really need to use another hardware's resource.

Quoted from Aussies_Online
The real question is:
Could I run my scanner on the P2 from the command on the P4?
The short answer is yes if the scanner can be shared (like printer).

Hope this helps.


Logged
Site Reply: 11 - 18
Aussies_Online
August 24, 2006, 8:45pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Quoted from antony
Yes, but probably not that easy or cheap to find one, as SCSI is now considered a great technology but being phased out.

It's called KVM Switch (or Video Switch or Monitor Switch).
KVM stands for keyboard, video monitor and mouse. you can use one set of keyboard, monitor and mouse to switch between multiple computers.

It's an yes and no answer. It depends on the application. In Mac, you can run some applications via networking I am not certain if you can do so with Windows or not. Perhaps, you can use Remote Desktop Connection if you really need to use another hardware's resource.

The short answer is yes if the scanner can be shared (like printer).

Hope this helps.


Thank you... This is all good.

I actually did some search on the Net after posting here and discovered that they were a PCI SCSI card for my scanner.

However, I contacted a shop via Email and got no answer back.

The KVM switch sound fabulous. Must get one of those as well.

Thank you Antony.



Logged
Reply: 12 - 18
Paula
December 20, 2006, 9:34am Report to Moderator

Live long and prosper...
eBlah! Moderator
Posts: 8545
Posts Per Day: 3.51
Time Online: 56 days 1 hours 14 minutes
Location: South Australia
Printers - I have a Lexmark that has just stopped working 3 months out of warranty.  Grrr.  What do others use?


Logged Offline
Site Reply: 13 - 18
antony
December 20, 2006, 11:15am Report to Moderator
Gold Class eBlaher
Posts: 962
Posts Per Day: 0.51
Time Online: 4 hours 51 minutes
Location: Sydney
For home, I usually buy the cheap inkjet printers for colour printing. Usually around $50 or less. When I see them on sale, I usually get two at once. Buying two inks (colour + black) would cost more than printer itself, and I don't do refills.


Logged
Site Reply: 14 - 18
2 Pages 1 2 » All Recommend Thread
Print

eBlah!    Technology    Technology - PC Talk  ›  PC Talk

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 

AustraliaAustralia
eBroadcast Australia
Australia eBlah! © © 09 eBroadcast Australia & e-Blah.com | About eBroadcast | Legal Notices | Privacy Policy | Contact Us    Return To The Main eBroadcast Homepage