Make eBroadcast my Homepage | Contact Us   Return To The Main eBroadcast Homepage
Australia
You're With Friends at eBlah!
Australia
WelcomeWelcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
Australia
Discussion Rooms
Recent Posts
My Messages
My Settings
Search
Help
Contact Admin
Login / Logout
Australia
Australia
Afghanistan
Australia
eBroadcast Login
Username: Create a new Account
Password:     Forgot Password

dsfdsfdsf
 Board Index    Politics    Politics - World  ›  Afghanistan
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 1 Guests

 Pages: 1
Recommend Print
  Author    Afghanistan   (currently 361 views)
ls
Posted on: October 31st, 2003, 5:03pm Report to Moderator
Posts: 248
Posts Per Day: 0.10
  Senators Worried Afghanistan Falling Apart
  By Jonathan Wright
  Reuters

  Wednesday 29 October 2003

  WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two influential U.S. senators questioned the stability of the Afghan government on Wednesday and warned the U.S. envoy and ambassador-designate to Kabul that the country may fall apart on his watch.

  "We are in jeopardy of losing Afghanistan to become a failed state again," Sen. Joseph Biden told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at a hearing on the nomination of Zalmay Khalilzad as ambassador to Kabul.

  "Are you confident that somehow you are not going to go out for an ambassadorship in which things, I wouldn't say fall apart at the seams, but nevertheless seem to be continually unraveling?" asked Sen. Richard Lugar, the Indiana Republican who is chairman of the committee.

  Khalilzad, an Afghan-born diplomat who has been at the center of U.S. policy in Afghanistan for the past two years, might find that "the engine seems to be falling apart" while he is in Kabul, Lugar added. "That would be a very unfortunate experience for you and tragic for us," he said.

  Lugar and Biden, a Delaware Democrat and ranking minority senator on the committee, have long urged a greater U.S. commitment to Afghanistan, which the United States invaded in 2001 to overthrow the ruling Taliban.

  The Taliban had sheltered al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, the man believed to have planned the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington in which 3,000 Americans died.

  The Bush administration has given Afghanistan a lower priority than Iraq, as reflected in its request that the U.S. Congress approve $20 billion for rebuilding Iraq and about $1 billion for Afghanistan.

  The United States has also pressed other members of NATO to provide most of the troops for an international peace force in Afghanistan. Until recently, it showed little enthusiasm for the idea of expanding the NATO force to areas outside Kabul.

  Biden said that even after NATO approved an expansion, he was not sure that the Bush administration fully backed it.

  DRUGS AND MONEY

  Biden also quoted a report by the Vienna-based U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime as saying that Afghanistan was in danger of falling into the hands of drug cartels.

  "Either major surgical drug-control measures are taken now or the drug cancer in Afghanistan will keep spreading and metastasize into corruption, violence and terrorism," the U.N. agency's director, Antonio Maria Costa, said in the report.

  "The opium framers and traffickers brought home about $2.3 billion -- or about half the country's legitimate gross domestic product -- in 2003, according to this report," Biden said.

  Khalilzad said success for the United States in Afghanistan was likely. "I think we are making progress. There are some trends that are not positive although I think we are heading strategically in the right direction," he added.

  "Those leaders who behave as warlords, I think their future is in some serious question. ... An area that I will focus on would be to assist the government ... to extend its authority and get faction leaders to cooperate and, if they don't cooperate, to find another line of work for them," he said.

  But U.S. officials said the National Security Council, where Khalilzad worked as special envoy for Afghan policy, was not unduly concerned about the phenomenon of Afghan warlords, who control whole provinces and run private armies.

The "Moral majority" is neither.
Logged Offline
Private Message
 Pages: 1
Recommend Print

Locked Board Board Index    Politics - World  [ previous | next ] Switch to:

Thread Rating
There is currently no rating for this thread
 
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post polls
You may not post attachments
HTML is off
Blah Code is on
Smilies are on
Australia
eBroadcast Australia
Australia © 06 eBroadcast Australia | Powered By E-Blah © 2001-2006 | About eBroadcast | Legal Notices | Privacy Policy | Contact Us    Return To The Main eBroadcast Homepage